Review Lenovo ThinkPad T430 Notebook
Instead of taking a radical alter, Lenovo steps gently in advancing their established ThinkPad serial. The quick Ivy Bridge processors should increment the performance and innovations, such as USB 3.0, should demonstrate their will to amend. But how will adherents of the ThinkPad react to the first integrated Chiclet keyboard?
If there is 1 notebook series, which can exist described with the word ‘timeless’, information technology would be the ThinkPad serial ofLenovo(formerly IBM). For 20 years these dinosaurs of computer history have been known as reliable business devices and their loftier quality/value, for many business organisation customers, often support a noble buy price.
Despite all the traditions the ThinkPads go frequent overhauls and upgrades. Later on we recently tested the models T530 and W530 we want to discuss the models of the T4xx series from the 2012 generation, more precisely theThinkPad T430. This succeeds the T420 and will be equipped equally well as the other models with the recent Ivy Bridge generation of Intel.
Our test device, which is the acme model of the series with a price ofalmost 1600 Euros(~$2093) (T430 N1XH2GE) , is run past the fastCore i7-3520M accompanied past 4 GB of RAM as well as a 500 GB hard deejay. Less expensive variants start at 1150 Euros/~$1504.The graphics will be handled past the professional personNVIDIA NVS 5400M. Moreover the customer can exist happy almost integratedUMTS
likewise as an enormous94 Wh battery. Typical for ThinkPad, their 14-inch WXGA++ display is coated with an anti-reflection layer in favor of ergonomics.
The traditional competitors of the ThinkPad are the business notebooks from HP and Dell. The respective reviews of the new EliteBook 8470w and Breadth E6430 are still to come, thus we will compare it with their predecessors including the ThinkPad T420. Permit’southward beginning the boxing in suit and tie!
Robust and reliable are the virtually important properties of the ThinkPad. This has not been changed during the years therefore the blueprint has a subordinate importance. The T430 and its sister models let united states of america slightly think of Mercedes’ G-Class: edged and primeval, but somehow as well timeless and indestructible. Thematte black upper surface; which is composed of carbon fiber, fiberglass and reinforced plastics, separates itself considerably from the shiny consumer devices.
Neither the looks nor the dimensions (341 x 232 x 29.9 mm/13.iv x nine.i x i.18 in.) nor the weight (2.33 kg/~v.1 pounds, battery included) accept inverse significantly compared to its predecessor. Even with the smaller 6-cell bombardment – our 9-cell battery sticks out about 2 centimeters (0.78 in.) – the notebook is non very special.
Known from before reviews, the case presents itself every bitvery house, but some details can be improved further. Above the DVD drive or at the top of the keyboard the chassis tin can be bent under a strong load without reaching a critical level. Also themachiningisnot perfected as can be seen on various transitions of unlike materials. Notwithstanding we clearly want to emphasize: These are just optical shortcomings, which arise due to very critical inspection and are too partly present on the devices of the competitors.
Many customers value their ThinkPad for the excellentmetal hinges, which are as well applied on the T430. These are one of the best on the market: Very tight, just absolute precise and without any clearance they hold the brandish, even during strong vibrations. The lid itself could be a little more than resistant to warping. During transportation the knownClamshell blueprint protects the display from dirt and damages due to an overlapping brandish frame.
In total we rate the T430 as good as its predecessor. However, the business notebooks of HP and Dell from the terminal year did satisfy us a scrap better in this regard so that Lenovo just earns the bronze medal.
Good things come up to those who expect: The ThinkPad T430 will finally exist equipped withUSB 3.0 ports. Lenovo even included ii of the new ports, which enable the connectedness of fast flash drives without any losses in speed – at to the lowest degree theoretically: Both ports are indented slightly into the instance which leads in many cases to alack of space. Our Corsair Flash Voyager collided with the chassis and therefore it had to exist continued to i of the two USB ii.0 ports. 1 of these has thePowered USBcharacteristic
enabling the charging of USB devices while the notebook is off.
Directly next to the two USB iii.0 ports the brandish output of the ThinkPad can exist plant, aMini DisplayPort. The commercially liked HDMI output is not integrated and thus an analog VGA output
is the only culling for a connectedness to an older monitor or LCD projector (apart from adapters). Another specialty is the scarcely usedExpressCard/34 slot which was as well integrated into the predecessor.
The connection slots of the T430 have been modified a fleck, but can still be criticized. In addition to the badly indented USB iii.0 ports, the 4-in-1 card reader (SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC) is not placed optimally. It would accept been better to place the display output equally well as the Kensington Lock next to the GBit-LAN on the backside and put frequently used connections about to the user.
Typical for the ThinkPad serial there is theconnection for the docking station, which can exist found underneath. Amongst others Lenovo offers the ‘ThinkPad Mini Dock Series iii’, which is available for a price of virtually 150 Euros (~$196) and is equipped with further connections (6 x USB iii.0, DVI, a display port). Alternatively a simple USB port expansion tin can be purchased from third-political party suppliers.
Talking about the back up of wireless standards the T430 is outstanding. It starts with the chosen WLAN adapter: Intel’due southCentrino Advanced-N 6205 transmits with IEEE802.11a/b/g/n and connects to networks of 2.4 GHz broadband besides as of 5 GHz broadband. Due to ii antennas and Multistream technology (2×2) it is possible to reach gross data ratesupwardly to 300 MBit/s while cheaper models ofttimes simply reach one-half of it. Amidst many other features, referring to the corresponding product folio of Intel, it supports for instance the Wireless Display technology.
Just that is not all: Bluetooth 4.0 too every bit a fastWWAN module including GPS (Ericsson H5321gw) is integrated equally well. Continued to a modern UMTS/HSPA++ mobile network the user can be pleased most download rates up to 21 MBit/due south (gross upload 5.76 MBit/due south). Unfortunately LTE is not supported.
To participate in videoconferences Lenovo equipped the T430 with an integrated Hd webcam (720p). A small LED indicates its activation. Compared with many other notebooks this webcam delivers a good image quality with high sharpness and low noise. The array microphone on both sides of the webcam has a very good speech quality although the recordings are lacking a bit of fineness at the loftier frequency range.
Thefingerprint scanner has been included on ThinkPad for years and is too integrated into the T430. For more than versatile security functions the manufacturer included a so-chosenTrusted Platform Module (TPM) according to TCG specification one.2.
The supplementary equipment turns out to exist sparse: Besides some brochures nada else is added. At to the lowest degree a commuter DVD or a recovery DVD would take been desirable additions, which have to exist created past the user himself in this case.
Side by side to the pre-installed operating system, Windows 7 64-bit, are the necessary drivers as well as extensive software packages. The near important application of these is the then-called
ThinkVantage Tool, which delivers a useful overview of many organisation properties. Amidst them; updating of drivers, modifying power options and managing scanned fingerprints.
Underneath the device themaintenance panelsecured with two screws is accessible. Behind information technology the second and all the same empty retentiveness slot of the notebook, the WWAN module equipped slot as well equally the BIOS battery can be found. Furthermore the DVD drive can be disassembled using a practical sliding mechanism to equip the UltraBay slot with other components.
In general it is possible to disassemble the notebook farther and almost whatsoever component tin be exchanged. Lenovo offers therefore a detailedHardware Maintenance Manual. All the same, circumspection must exist taken: The user should have the necessary expertise and tools and be aware of the possibility of losing the warranty. It is recommended to advise the manufacturer directly in case of problems.
Concerning warranty the other manufacturers tin can take a leaf out of Lenovo’s book. At least German language customers get a generous3-year bring-in warranty, which tin be upgraded to a 4 or 5-year onsite service for an actress accuse of 100 to 200 Euros (~$131 to $262) depending on the dealer.
A ThinkPad with aChiclet keyboard? ‘Crime!’ some would shout with the expectation that the T430 will endure a loss of quality with respect to its predecessors. Concerning looks and manufacturing these worries are unfounded: From now on the complete blackness plastic keys are convincing due to its excellent haptic and there is no indication of sponginess or other defects. All the alphabetic character keys are formed ergonomically and are slightly concave on the upper face to improve accuracy. In the night the user will appreciate the traditionalThinkLightnext to the webcam; alternatively a two-phase adjustablekeyboard backlight can be activated.
Concerning the layout Lenovo nevertheless has a mind of its own and swaps the Fn-key with the Ctrl-key. Fans of the ThinkPad might accustom themselves to this difference, simply new-comers will find a dissimilar alignment of some command keys (Print, Del, Home, End,…). In general we have the opinion that the new blueprint is tidier and bundled better even though regular customers might need some familiarization. And how is the typing feeling? It feels perfect! Theforce per unit area bespeak is firm and stiff and impresses with perfect precision, additionally the keys evangelize a comfortable andgenerous stroke length. At loftier writing speeds the keyboard gives a deadening and mechanical rattling which confirms the firm overall impression without getting too loud or intrusive.
Trackpoint and Touchpad
For some thetrackpointis a needless relict from former times, others even so appreciate it as a reasonable culling to the touchpad. It is certain that the small scarlet betoken betwixt the letters G, H and B has its advantages by allowing the benefit of both avery fast and a very verbal mouse command. Two quiet clicking buttons beneath the space bar serve as mouse buttons while in between the scroll function tin be found.
Under the designation ‘UltraNav’ Lenovo combines the trackpoint with an boosted
touchpad. It comes from Synaptics and seems to be fairly pocket-sized with a size ofvii.v x four.5 centimeters (2.95 ten 1.77 in.). In return, the crude surface compensates for its size due to good sliding properties, high precision likewise every bit the support of variousmutlitouch gestures. Information technology comes in handy that while using the trackpoint the touchpad deactivates automatically. Directly beneath the touchpad the manufacturer integrated a 2nd pair of mouse buttons, which do not seem to take such a premium quality.
Although the manufacturer integrated some other brandish compared with the ThinkPad T420 (Lenovo LP140WD2-TLD2) it hasabout the aforementioned cheap TN panel. Nighttime image sections have a lack of flotation depth due to a disappointingblackness level value of one.47 cd/m² and that is the reason for a slightly improvedcontrast ratio of 178:1. However, the ThinkPad is not the but one: The directly competitors from HP and Dell have an equally bad display.
Even though notebooks such as the T430 are meant for business customers, it is not recommended for every working branch. Professional photographers or designer should look for other models equally is demonstrated by thestrongly limited color spectrum. Neither the AdobeRGB nor the sRGB are completely covered for which a special WCG or a RGD LED backlight is necessary. Private users nevertheless are unlikely be affected by this limitation especially because simply a few notebooks fulfill these requirements.
Distribution of brightness
Maximum: 261 cd/thou² (Nits) Average: 246.8 cd/yard²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 261 cd/grand²
Contrast: 178:one (Black: 1.47 cd/m²)41.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll ii.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
39.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
The higher brightness makes it possible to read the display
outdoorsfifty-fifty better. Anyway, a matte surface is standard for Lenovo’s professional models in such a mode that annoying reflections are prevented. Solely in direct sunshine the display loses the battle confronting its surroundings; but by turning the notebook abroad from the light source information technology is even possible to work outdoors during midsummer..
Another and very regularly mentioned disadvantage of TN panels is the
stability of the viewing angle. The ThinkPad T430 shows the same bug as many other notebooks with cheap displays: Especially a change in vertical angle leads to distorted colors and contrasts up to a completely unrecognizable image content. The operational range in horizontal direction can be considered a petty more generous although information technology cannot compete with the IPS panel of the smaller ThinkPad X220.
Finally we investigated the signal quality of the analog VGA output. Apart from a slight flickering peculiarly at high resolutions nothing else can exist criticized, nevertheless the operator should preferably use a digital output when possible.
Potential buyers of the ThinkPad T430 can choose from iii unlike processors of Intel’southward current Ivy Bridge models. While the cheaper variant is either the Core i5-3210M or the 3320M, our test device is run past the current fastest dual-core CPU on the market, theCadre i7-3520M. All the mentioned processors have aTDP of 35 Watts while the identically specified quad-core i7-3612QM is unfortunately not offered past Lenovo.
Fifty-fifty with just two cores theCore i7-3520M with a speed of2.9 GHz
reveals a considerable performance buffer, which can be increased up to 3.6 GHz (2 Cores: 3.4 GHz) thanks to Turbo Heave. The smaller Cadre i5 models besides every bit the 3520M back up thehyperthreading technology, enabling the parallel processing of 2 threads per core. As minor compensation for the considerable college price the Cadre i7 scores with a bigger L3 cache (four MB instead of iii MB).
The video brandish is either handled by the integrated Hd Graphics 4000 or theNVIDIA VS 5400M
depending on the model. All the notebooks with dedicated NVIDIA GPU – same as the test device – can access theOptimus technology for dynamical switching between both GPUs.
With just4 GB of RAM (ane x 4 GB Micron DDR3-1600) the notebook is equipped with a moderate configuration for electric current proportions, particularly with regard to on-going low memory prices. Also the chosen500 GB HDD we would not consider to be generous, even so it should be sufficient for the bulk of operators also equally the retentivity.
Organisation Information Lenovo ThinkPad T430
Although – as we have mentioned – Intel’due southCore i7-3520M is the fastest dual-cadre processor that 1 can buy, the improvement with respect to the predecessor models based on the Sandy Span compages seems relatively low. Compared with the ThinkPad T420 (Core i7-2620M) the advantage of the new model just amounts to 12 percent. During the single thread examination of theCinebench R10 the score increases from 5438 to6074 points and during multithreading from 11507 to12913 points (64-fleck in both cases).
The deficit with respect to the quad-core model is extensive: Even the smallest model, the Core i7-3612QM, is in the optimum case 70 percent faster. Yet, information technology is comprehensible that Lenovo limits itself to the nominal weaker dual cores. On one side at that place are the good parallelized 3D renders or video encoders, which can exploit the additional operation buffer of the other cores very wisely. On the other side even an economical quad-cadre might demand a higher power, although information technology is classified in the same TDP class (35 Watts) by Intel.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
No SSD, no hd enshroud, only a classical hard disk – because the purchase price this is kind of disappointing. After all we are dealing with theHitachi Travelstar Z7K500 (structure acme 7 millimeters/0.28 inches) which is a very fast model with just one platter, 32 MB cache and 7200 RPM.
This is reflected in the remarkabletransfer charge per unit of nigh 100 MB/s
in the HDTune Benchmark, being – aside from the SSD competitors – i of the all-time hard disks. The admission time of 18.1 milliseconds is however a typical value for mechanical hard disks, which actually depends only on the revolution speed. Even the cheapest SSD needs just 0.1 milliseconds, specially allowing the access of modest files to exist very fast. Those who similar to purchase the ThinkPad T430 with an SSD (180GB) in Federal republic of germany, have to accept on-board graphics and a Cadre i5-3210M.
Another possibility would be to configure the T430 with anmSATA SSD. This would take the spot of the UMTS modem, which cannot exist additionally placed on some other spot. Different shops offer models with a capacity of 40GB – 256GB of varying manufacturers. Therefore it is possible to execute an upgrade on your own. However, nosotros did not exam the mSATA slot together with an optional SSD.
Transfer Rate Minimum: 37.6 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 127.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 99 MB/s
Sequential Read: 114.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 112.three MB/due south
4K QD32 Write: 0.734 MB/s
Without an SSD and with just a small improvement of the processor operation thearrangement performance remains on the aforementioned level every bit its predecessor – past no means poor. In the popular Criterion Suites from Futuremark it reached a consequence of 8385 (PCMark Vantage) or 2430 points (PCMark vii), which are almost identical with the fifteen-inch model ThinkPad T530.
During daily routine it might be hard to find performance differences compared with the T420. The buffer of the processor however, is suited for almost every situation, although sometimes an SSD is preferred. The inevitable filibuster occurring when hard disks launch big programs would have been reduced with an SSD.
Windows vii Experience Index
Calculations per second
Memory operations per second
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
3D business organisation and gaming graphics
Main hard disk drive
Deejay data transfer charge per unit
|PCMark Vantage Event||8385 points|
|PCMark seven Score||2430 points|
With the and so-calledNVIDIA NVS 5400M probably most users do not know what we are talking about. It is also known as the GeForce GT 630M on the consumer market place, although this has a slightly college clocking speed and is not specially designated for professional applications.
Both graphics cards are based on theforty nanometer chip GF108 or the newer 28 nanometer bit GF117. In our case we are probably dealing with the GF108 version, which is – bated from slightly higher power consumption – non different from the GF117 variant. The NVS 5400M has96 shader units (Fermi compages), acore speed of 660 MHz (can be boosted up to 800 MHz) and a 128-chip retentiveness slot, which is equipped with a1 GB DDR3 VRAM (900 MHz) on the T430.
Nonetheless, the NVS series cannot be put on the same level equally the expensive Quadro models, whose special drivers hope another performance increase in CAD software. That is also reflected in our benchmarks: The NVS 5400M is nip and constrict with the GT 630M duringSPECviewperf xi, without revealing an obvious winner. The NVS 4200M, installed in last year’due south T420/T420s, withal, does not stand a chance.
|Lenovo ThinkPad T430
NVS 5400M, 3520M, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
|Lenovo ThinkPad T420s 4174-PEG
NVS 4200M, 2640M, Intel SSD 320 Serial SSDSA2BW160G3L
GeForce GT 630M, 3610QM, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
|1920×1080 Siemens NX||
Likewise, similar performance is found during the classical 3D benchmarks of3D Mark 11. In the case of the ‘Performance Preset’ out test device scores1263 points, which is on the same level as notebooks equipped with the GT-630M. Every bit well every bit its GeForce analogue, the NVS 5400M can but compete with the lower mid-class graphics cards of the current standards.
|3DMark 03 Standard||22733 points|
|3DMark 05 Standard||18021 points|
|3DMark 06 Standard Score||9170 points|
|3DMark Vantage P Result||5205 points|
|3DMark xi Performance||1263 points|
In society to rate theNVS 5400M even meliorate nosotros want to have a look at its gaming functioning, although this might non exist the chief field of application of a ThinkPad.
The high native display resolution of 1600×900 pixels asks too much of the notebook’s performance buffer during the bulk of recentgames. Titles such as
orDeus EX: Human Revolution
can exist played with 1366×768 pixels and medium settings fluently. Notwithstanding, playing games such as
, Battlefield 3
as well as
Risen ii, which demand college graphical performance, is only possible with fifty-fifty lower settings. In general the NVS 5400M, just every bit much as the comparable faster GeForce GT 630M, tin can be used to play every modern game smoothly. Those expecting the best visual appearance, should expect out for at to the lowest degree a GeForce GT 650M or faster – for these users the T430 is definitely non recommended.
Every bit with the predecessor the cooling fan runs the whole time, producing however, a quiet32.2 dB(A) duringidle country. Above all the book level is absolutely constant and does not increase during browsing, video playback or modest multitasking. Only during accessing the hard disk drive is an audible noise present, which volition especially annoy sensitive operators.
Also during acollege load the ThinkPad presents itself in the best light. It is not as tranquility as the T420 with35.6 dB(A) during 3DMark 06, however this notebook did it without a dedicated graphic card. For the 2011 competitors Dell Latitude E6420 and HP EliteBook 8460p we measure considerably higher dissonance levels, which were not even reached by the T430 during the stress test. In the idle state the fan reduces its revolutions within a few seconds.
32.2 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
35.vi / dB(A)
35.half dozen / 38.2 dB(A)
The depression arrangement noise is achieved with a very conservative cooling system, which leads to expectedly high temperatures. At first glance the user does not notice annihilation duringidle time: Despite the high temperatures of the summer the casing keeps very absurd with an average temperature of31 degree Celsius, which allows employ on the lap.
This changes drastically when we demand full performance. On many spots on the upper side as well equally underneath the temperature rises above fifty degrees Celsius, even the average temperature of42 to 46 degrees Celsius is very high. The left side of the palm rest is the well-nigh critical spot since its temperature becomes so high that information technology limits the usage of the whole notebook. However, these temperatures occur during the application of the intensive operation benchmark programs
Prime95 and FurMark.
Internally the processor and the graphics card heat upward likewise. TheCore i7-3520M settled at a value of100 degrees Celsius after ane 60 minutes during the stress test, but kept a clocking speed of 3.1 – 3.two GHz. For theNVS 5400M nosotros measured a slightly lower temperature of92 degree Celsius, however it wasthrottled to 500 MHz periodically. Also here we would say this does not occur in do.
|Maximum: 50.two °C = 122 F
Average: 41.6 °C = 107 F
|Maximum: 55.ane °C = 131 F
Average: 45.7 °C = 114 F
Ability Supply (max.) 61.8 °C = 143 F | Room Temperature 24.iv °C = 76 F | Voltcraft IR-360
|Maximum: 34.5 °C = 94 F
Average: 31.one °C = 88 F
|Maximum: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Average: thirty.half-dozen °C = 87 F
Power Supply (max.) 39.iii °C = 103 F | Room Temperature 23.9 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-360
The boilerplate temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the grade Office.
The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.two °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the form Office.
The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 31.i °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 29.four °C / 85 F.
The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the affect with a maximum of 43.7 °C / 110.seven F.
The average temperature of the palmrest surface area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-15.9 °C / -28.vii F).
As usual the speakers of a business organisation notebook are more than an extra feature, since their practical usage is intended for playback of speech and organization sounds. For this purpose thespeakers of the T430 are sufficient but not beyond.Almost no bass is present and the maximum audio level is depression, but the mid and high range frequencies are well-balanced. Altogether information technology is recommended to connect external speakers or headphones since a proficient quality jack output is nowadays. Alternatively it is possible to connect modern receivers with the use of the DisplayPort (using a HDMI adapter).
An boosted GPU was i of the main causes for a loftier consumption during theidle state
in the past. Thanks to NVIDIA’s Optimus technology this GPU should not have a negative effect on the power consumption. Notwithstanding, dispite the power saving features, the T430 surprises us with high power consumption between10.two and 17.6 Watts – most 4 to v Watts more compared to the preceding model.
When fully utilized the ThinkPad does not behave differently. During3DMark 06 the notebook consumes72.3 Watts while during our stress test the value increases to 84 Watts. For a xiv-inch notebook with a dual-cadre processor and a mediocre GPU these values are too loftier. We could not identify the cause for this directly, but information technology confirms our supposition that the equipped NVS 5400M is based on the old 40 nanometer chip GF108. Lenovo seems to be enlightened of this fact and provided therefore a dedicated90 Watt AC adapter. However, we could detect, that the T430 used free energy from the battery during total utilization.
Our examination device has a9-cell battery with an enormous94 Wh while other models of this series should manage with a 6-jail cell battery with 57 Wh. In addition Lenovo offers abattery-slice with another 94 Wh which was not included in our test packet.
Due to the high ability consumption the ThinkPad gives away a part of its potential. However, it reaches a very adept runtime. In the case of theBattery Eater Reader’s test (ability saving profile, minimum brightness, the wireless modules and NVIDIA GPU off) the T430 has a bombardment runtime of
near ten hours.
Imitating a realistic scenario, with the display brightness set to nigh 150 cd/thousand², activatedWLAN
modules and web browsing including video playback, the runtime withal reached6 hours and 29 minutes. Surprisingly the bigger T530 with identical configuration has a considerably longer runtime in our review.
Those working with the notebook during traveling and demanding full power will exist satisfied: Neither the processor nor the GPU are throttled when powered by the battery. Yet, a power socket should be close-by since in the instance of 3D applications such equally theBattery Eater Archetype test (maximum power, maximum brightness, wireless modules and NVIDIA GPU activated) the battery runtime reaches barely more than2 hours. To charge the battery some patience is needed because it needs more iii hours to restore 95 per centum of the chapters.
|Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)||9h 44min|
|WiFi Surfing||6h 29min|
|Load (maximum brightness)||2h 04min|
We did not expect theLenovo ThinkPad T430 to be surprisingly different earlier the review. The Lenovo ThinkPad series has a lot of regular customers and these want to exist maintained by the manufacturer. Yet Lenovo was successful in improving the predecessor T420 gently without losing its established qualities.
Information technology starts with the classical case of the series. It does not earn a prize for its beauty or all-time manufacturing quality compared to current standards, just with asolid and well-engineered compages information technology has some advantages compared with its competitors with their noble aluminum chassis. Finally the ThinkPad is equipped withUSB 3.0 although Lenovo should reconsider its positioning.
Once in activeness theexcellent input devices impressed u.s. though we had been skeptical concerning the Chiclet keyboard. In addition the important details such as integrated UMTS and unlike security features are worth business customer’southward while – even if they are known from the predecessor. In regard to functioning the T430 is not a big comeback, however nosotros were surprised at thehigh ability consumption. This led to a disappointing battery runtime despite the enormous chapters – admittedly at a very loftier level. The temperatures turned out to exist very high, considering the cooling system is rather optimized with respect to arrangement noise.
Review unit provided by …
NVIDIA NVS 5400M – 1024 MB, Core: 800 MHz, Retentivity: 900 MHz, DDR3-VRAM, ForceWare 295.eighty, Optimus
, 1x 4096 MByte Micron DDR3-1600 CL11, 2 Slots
14.00 inch xvi:nine, 1600 x 900 pixel, Lenovo LP140WD2-TLD2, LED-TN-Panel, glossy: no
Intel QM77 (Panther Point)
Intel Panther Bespeak PCH – High Definition Sound Controller
1 Express Bill of fare 34mm, 2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / iii.1 Gen1, i VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Sound Connections: Headset-Anschluss (three,five Millimeter Klinke), Card Reader: 4-in-1 carte reader(SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC), i Fingerprint Reader
Intel 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Centrino Avant-garde-N 6205 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi iv), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.0, H5321 gw Mobile Broadband
Optiarc DVD RW AD-7740H
height 10 width x depth (in mm): 29.nine ten 341 x 232 ( = 1.18 x 13.43 10 9.13 in)
94 Wh Lithium-Ion, ix prison cell, overlapping
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional person 64 Scrap
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Cursory instruction, ThinkVantage Tools, Adobe Reader X, Corel WinDVD, 36 Months Warranty
2.33 kg ( = 82.19 oz / 5.fourteen pounds), Power Supply: 300 g ( = 10.58 oz / 0.66 pounds)
Devices with the
Aforementioned Screen Size and/or Weight
- Further own reviews
- Available external reviews sorted by display size
- Available external reviews sorted by graphics
- Search for reviews in the all-encompassing library of notebookCHECK.com
- Tips for buying a notebook – notebookCHECK Purchase Advisory
- Observe the right notebook – notebookCHECK Hardware Guide
- Display resolution comparison – DPI (grain size) of displays
- Our exam criteria
- Manufacturer’s information
Excellent input devices
USB iii.0 and docking port
Good application performance
Low system dissonance
|+||iii yr warranty|
Bad brandish dissimilarity and poor angle of view
High ability consumption
High temperature development
|–||HDMI only via an adapter|
What we liked
At offset we were scared about the Chiclet keyboard, all the same, it impressed us with its perfect quality and the excellent type feeling. In total the input devices are the all-time components of the ThinkPad.
What we missed
It were not many and more often than not pocket-sized defects nosotros establish during the review of the T430. We would like to run across the next ThinkPad with a qualitatively higher display to meliorate the disappointing dissimilarity as well as the limited angle of view.
What surprised us
Information technology is amazing how piddling the visual appearance of the ThinkPad has changed during the concluding years. We are excited if a successor will still accept the same appearance in 5 or 10 years.
The biggest competitors of the T430 will be HP’s EliteBook 8460p/8470w and Dell’southward Latitude E6420/E6430. Other alternatives are the Lenovo’s 15-inch version ThinkPad T530 or the smaller Sony Vaio Southward-Series.
Lenovo ThinkPad T430
– Weighted Average
Till Schönborn, 2012-09-22 (Update: 2022-04-30)